{"id":23010,"date":"2026-07-07T16:02:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-07T14:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/?p=23010"},"modified":"2026-07-07T16:29:12","modified_gmt":"2026-07-07T14:29:12","slug":"supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/","title":{"rendered":"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Gjykata Supreme e Kosov\u00ebs i ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuara pes\u00eb ankesat administrative t\u00eb paraqitura kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb Panelit Zgjedhor p\u00ebr Ankesa dhe Parashtresa (PZAP), lidhur me rezultatet p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve t\u00eb Parakohshme p\u00ebr Kuvendin e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.29\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn e List\u00ebs Serbe, t\u00eb paraqitur kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb, ZP.Anr.56\/2026. Lista Serbe pretendonte se subjekti politik &#8220;GI \u2013 Za Slobodu, Pravdu i Opstanak&#8221; (ZSPO) kishte siguruar mandatin e rezervuar p\u00ebr komunitetin serb kryesisht p\u00ebrmes votave t\u00eb fituara n\u00eb komuna dhe vendvotime me shumic\u00eb shqiptare, duke cenuar, sipas saj, q\u00ebllimin kushtetues t\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimit autentik t\u00eb komunitetit serb. Gjykata Supreme vler\u00ebson se k\u00ebto pretendime jan\u00eb t\u00eb pabazuara. Gjykata thekson se sipas Kushtetut\u00ebs s\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs dhe Ligjit p\u00ebr Zgjedhjet e P\u00ebrgjithshme, vota \u00ebsht\u00eb personale, e barabart\u00eb, e lir\u00eb dhe e fsheht\u00eb dhe se Lista e Votuesve nuk p\u00ebrmban t\u00eb dh\u00ebna p\u00ebr p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsin\u00eb etnike t\u00eb votuesve. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, nuk ekziston baz\u00eb ligjore q\u00eb vlefshm\u00ebria ose efekti juridik i nj\u00eb vote t\u00eb varet nga p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsia etnike e votuesit apo nga struktura demografike e vendbanimit ku \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb ajo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjykata gjithashtu konstaton se ankuesi nuk ka paraqitur prova konkrete q\u00eb do t\u00eb d\u00ebshmonin manipulim t\u00eb votave ose ndonj\u00eb parregullsi tjet\u00ebr zgjedhore q\u00eb do t\u00eb ndikonte n\u00eb rezultatin zgjedhor. Pretendimet e paraqitura mb\u00ebshteteshin n\u00eb supozime dhe krahasime statistikore, t\u00eb cilat, sipas Gjykat\u00ebs, nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb baz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb rezultatin zgjedhor. Po ashtu, Gjykata vler\u00ebson se vet\u00eb subjekti politik q\u00eb kishte fituar mandatin e kontestuar \u00ebsht\u00eb subjekt i regjistruar p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimin e komunitetit serb, prandaj nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet se \u00ebsht\u00eb cenuar mekanizmi kushtetues i vendeve t\u00eb garantuara.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.30\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn e kandidates Emilija Rexhepi, nga subjekti politik Nova Demokratska Stranka (NDS), t\u00eb paraqitur kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb, ZP.Anr.57\/2026. Ankuesja kishte kund\u00ebrshtuar vendimin e PZAP-s\u00eb, duke pretenduar ekzistonte nj\u00eb mosp\u00ebrputhje nd\u00ebrmjet struktur\u00ebs demografike t\u00eb vendbanimit dhe rezultatit zgjedhor, duke k\u00ebrkuar anulimin e k\u00ebtyre votave p\u00ebr efekt t\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarjes s\u00eb mandatit t\u00eb garantuar p\u00ebr komunitetin boshnjak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjykata vler\u00ebson se pretendimet e ankueses mb\u00ebshteten n\u00eb interpretime statistikore dhe demografike, t\u00eb cilat nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb baz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr t\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dyshim vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e votave apo rezultatin zgjedhor. Legjislacioni zgjedhor i Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs nuk parashikon struktur\u00ebn etnike t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb si kriter p\u00ebr vler\u00ebsimin e ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb votimit apo t\u00eb rezultateve zgjedhore.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Po ashtu, Gjykata thekson se Lista e Votuesve nuk p\u00ebrmban t\u00eb dh\u00ebna mbi p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsin\u00eb etnike t\u00eb votuesve, nd\u00ebrsa Komisioni Qendror i Zgjedhjeve nuk mbledh, administron apo p\u00ebrpunon t\u00eb dh\u00ebna t\u00eb tilla. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, nuk ekziston baz\u00eb ligjore p\u00ebr shpalljen e pavlefshme t\u00eb flet\u00ebvotimeve mbi supozime q\u00eb lidhen me p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsin\u00eb etnike t\u00eb votuesve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Kolegji i Gjykat\u00ebs Supreme vler\u00ebson se ankuesja nuk ka paraqitur prova t\u00eb qarta dhe bind\u00ebse q\u00eb do t\u00eb d\u00ebshmonin manipulim t\u00eb votave, nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb procesin e votimit, cenim t\u00eb zinxhirit t\u00eb siguris\u00eb apo shkelje t\u00eb procedurave zgjedhore, si\u00e7 k\u00ebrkohet nga Ligji p\u00ebr Zgjedhjet e P\u00ebrgjithshme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.31\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn e kandidates Emilija Rexhepi, nga subjekti politik Nova Demokratska Stranka (NDS), t\u00eb paraqitur kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb, ZP.A.nr.58\/2026. Ankuesja kishte k\u00ebrkuar verifikimin e ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb votave t\u00eb fituara nga subjekti politik Za Slobodu, Pravdu i Opstanak (ZSPO) n\u00eb gjasht\u00eb qendra votimi n\u00eb Komun\u00ebn e Prizrenit, duke pretenduar se ato vota ishin realizuar n\u00eb vendbanime me shumic\u00eb t\u00eb komunitetit boshnjak dhe se kjo duhej t\u00eb verifikohej n\u00eb funksion t\u00eb mbrojtjes s\u00eb vendeve t\u00eb garantuara p\u00ebr komunitetin serb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjykata Supreme vler\u00ebson se vendimi i PZAP-s\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i drejt\u00eb dhe i bazuar n\u00eb ligj. Kjo, pasi legjislacioni zgjedhor nuk e lidh vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e vot\u00ebs me p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsin\u00eb etnike t\u00eb votuesit dhe se nuk ekziston baz\u00eb kushtetuese apo ligjore q\u00eb votat t\u00eb vler\u00ebsohen mbi baz\u00ebn e struktur\u00ebs etnike t\u00eb nj\u00eb vendbanimi. Sipas Gjykat\u00ebs, e drejta e vot\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb individuale dhe \u00e7do qytetar \u00ebsht\u00eb i lir\u00eb t\u00eb votoj\u00eb p\u00ebr subjektin politik q\u00eb zgjedh, pa marr\u00eb parasysh p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsin\u00eb e tij etnike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjykata rikujton se Kushtetuta garanton nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn individuale t\u00eb vot\u00ebs dhe mekanizmin e vendeve t\u00eb garantuara p\u00ebr komunitetet jo-shumic\u00eb, por k\u00ebto garanci nuk autorizojn\u00eb organet zgjedhore apo gjykatat t\u00eb kategorizojn\u00eb votat sipas p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsis\u00eb etnike t\u00eb votuesve ose t\u00eb nxjerrin p\u00ebrfundime mbi vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e tyre bazuar n\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebna demografike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Po ashtu, Gjykata konstaton se ankuesja nuk kishte paraqitur prova konkrete p\u00ebr manipulim t\u00eb flet\u00ebvotimeve, nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb materialin zgjedhor apo ndonj\u00eb shkelje tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb procesit zgjedhor. Mosp\u00ebrputhja statistikore nd\u00ebrmjet struktur\u00ebs demografike t\u00eb vendbanimeve dhe numrit t\u00eb votave t\u00eb fituara nga nj\u00eb subjekt politik, n\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb provave p\u00ebr parregullsi zgjedhore dhe t\u00eb nj\u00eb baze t\u00eb qart\u00eb ligjore, nuk mund t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb pasoja juridike mbi vlefshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e votave ose rezultatin zgjedhor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.32\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn e Bekim Haxhiut, kandidat p\u00ebr deputet n\u00eb Kuvendin e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs, nga subjekti politik: Partia Demokratike e Kosov\u00ebs (PDK), t\u00eb paraqitur kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb, ZP.Anr.54\/2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bekim Haxhiu kishte pretenduar se vendimi i PZAP-s\u00eb ishte marr\u00eb mbi baz\u00ebn e konstatimit t\u00eb gabuar dhe jo t\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb gjendjes faktike, zbatimit t\u00eb gabuar t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs materiale dhe procedurale zgjedhore, si dhe se ishin cenuar t\u00eb drejtat e tij kushtetuese p\u00ebr t\u2019u zgjedhur, barazia procedurale dhe e drejta p\u00ebr mjet juridik efektiv. Ai kishte k\u00ebrkuar rinum\u00ebrimin e plot\u00eb t\u00eb votave preferenciale t\u00eb kandidat\u00ebve t\u00eb PDK-s\u00eb n\u00eb vendvotimet q\u00eb nuk ishin p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb mostr\u00ebn prej 185 vendvotimeve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjykata Supreme vler\u00ebson se ankuesi nuk kishte paraqitur prova t\u00eb mjaftueshme q\u00eb do t\u00eb arsyetonin rinum\u00ebrimin e plot\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa raporti i Komisionit Qendror t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve (KQZ) p\u00ebr rinum\u00ebrimin e 185 vendvotimeve nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebnte baz\u00eb t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr nj\u00eb mas\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjykata vler\u00ebson se korrigjimet e evidentuara apo t\u00eb pasqyruara n\u00eb raport, nuk krijojn\u00eb nj\u00eb baz\u00eb objektive p\u00ebr t\u00eb konkluduar se procesi i num\u00ebrimit \u00ebsht\u00eb karakterizuar nga parregullsi sistematike. Natyra dhe shp\u00ebrndarja e k\u00ebtyre korrigjimeve tregojn\u00eb se ato kan\u00eb qen\u00eb sporadike dhe nuk kan\u00eb arritur nj\u00eb intensitet t\u00eb till\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb cenonte besueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e rezultatit p\u00ebrfundimtar apo integritetin e procesit t\u00eb num\u00ebrimit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.33\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn kandidatit p\u00ebr deputet Q\u00ebndrim Kryeziu, nga Subjekti Politik Partia Demokratike e Kosov\u00ebs (PDK), me seli n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb, e paraqitur kund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb PZAP-se, ZP.Anr.55\/2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Q\u00ebndrim Kryeziu pretendoi se PZAP gabimisht e kishte trajtuar ankes\u00ebn e tij si \u00e7\u00ebshtje tashm\u00eb t\u00eb gjykuar, ndon\u00ebse, sipas tij, ankesa ngrinte nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje m\u00eb t\u00eb gjer\u00eb lidhur me besueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e rezultatit p\u00ebrfundimtar t\u00eb list\u00ebs s\u00eb PDK-s\u00eb. Ai argumentoi se fakti q\u00eb ndryshime ishin evidentuar te 90 nga 110 kandidat\u00ebt e PDK-s\u00eb, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ishte verifikuar vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e vog\u00ebl e votave, ngrinte dyshime p\u00ebr sakt\u00ebsin\u00eb e rezultatit p\u00ebrfundimtar. Po ashtu, ai pretendoi se raporti i KQZ-s\u00eb d\u00ebshmonte ekzistenc\u00ebn e nj\u00eb defekti sistematik n\u00eb procesin e num\u00ebrimit fillestar, si dhe kishte k\u00ebrkuar rinum\u00ebrimin e plot\u00eb t\u00eb votave preferenciale t\u00eb kandidat\u00ebve t\u00eb PDK-s\u00eb dhe pezullimin e certifikimit t\u00eb rezultatit zgjedhor deri n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin e k\u00ebtij procesi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nga shqyrtimi i shkresave t\u00eb l\u00ebnd\u00ebs, Gjykata Supreme konstatoi se PZAP kishte shqyrtuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb rregullt pretendimet e ankuesit dhe kishte arritur n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ankesa ishte e pabazuar. Gjykata vler\u00ebson se pretendimet e paraqitura mb\u00ebshteteshin n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtat t\u00eb dh\u00ebna dhe rezultate t\u00eb rinum\u00ebrimit q\u00eb kishin qen\u00eb objekt i shqyrtimit edhe m\u00eb par\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa raporti i KQZ-s\u00eb nuk provonte ekzistenc\u00ebn e parregullsive sistematike q\u00eb do t\u00eb impononin rinum\u00ebrim t\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb votave. Gjithashtu, u vler\u00ebsua se rinum\u00ebrimi i 185 vendvotimeve ishte realizuar n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb mekanizmave t\u00eb kontrollit t\u00eb parapar\u00eb me legjislacionin zgjedhor dhe jo si pasoj\u00eb e konstatimit t\u00eb parregullsive sistematike n\u00eb procesin e num\u00ebrimit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Gjykata Supreme vler\u00ebson se vendimet e PZAP-s\u00eb jan\u00eb marr\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me Kushtetut\u00ebn dhe Ligjin nr. 08\/L-228 p\u00ebr Zgjedhjet e P\u00ebrgjithshme n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn e Kosov\u00ebs dhe se pretendimet ankimore nuk jan\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur me prova bind\u00ebse q\u00eb do t\u00eb justifikonin nd\u00ebrhyrjen n\u00eb rezultatet p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb zgjedhjeve.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gjykata Supreme e Kosov\u00ebs i ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuara pes\u00eb ankesat administrative t\u00eb paraqitura kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb Panelit Zgjedhor p\u00ebr Ankesa dhe Parashtresa (PZAP), lidhur me rezultatet p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve t\u00eb Parakohshme p\u00ebr Kuvendin e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs. Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.29\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn e List\u00ebs Serbe, t\u00eb paraqitur [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":23011,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-kosove","category-lajme"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb - Kosova Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb - Kosova Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gjykata Supreme e Kosov\u00ebs i ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuara pes\u00eb ankesat administrative t\u00eb paraqitura kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb Panelit Zgjedhor p\u00ebr Ankesa dhe Parashtresa (PZAP), lidhur me rezultatet p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve t\u00eb Parakohshme p\u00ebr Kuvendin e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs. Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.29\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn e List\u00ebs Serbe, t\u00eb paraqitur [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Kosova Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-07T14:02:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-07T14:29:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Supreme.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"780\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"i l\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"i l\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"i l\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7586712b9c512fe68085de007378c915\"},\"headline\":\"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-07T14:02:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-07T14:29:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1525,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Supreme.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Kosov\u00eb\",\"Lajme\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/\",\"name\":\"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb - Kosova Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Supreme.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-07T14:02:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-07T14:29:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7586712b9c512fe68085de007378c915\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Supreme.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Supreme.jpg\",\"width\":780,\"height\":500},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/07\\\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kosova Times\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7586712b9c512fe68085de007378c915\",\"name\":\"i l\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bad9296e02816160ae2e2435beda58222022298d5625d49fea74d18816fbb31d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bad9296e02816160ae2e2435beda58222022298d5625d49fea74d18816fbb31d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/bad9296e02816160ae2e2435beda58222022298d5625d49fea74d18816fbb31d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"i l\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kosovatimes.info\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/iliri\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb - Kosova Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb - Kosova Times","og_description":"Gjykata Supreme e Kosov\u00ebs i ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuara pes\u00eb ankesat administrative t\u00eb paraqitura kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb Panelit Zgjedhor p\u00ebr Ankesa dhe Parashtresa (PZAP), lidhur me rezultatet p\u00ebrfundimtare t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve t\u00eb Parakohshme p\u00ebr Kuvendin e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs. Me aktgjykimin AA.nr.29\/2026, Gjykata Supreme ka refuzuar si t\u00eb pabazuar ankes\u00ebn e List\u00ebs Serbe, t\u00eb paraqitur [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/","og_site_name":"Kosova Times","article_published_time":"2026-07-07T14:02:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-07T14:29:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":780,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Supreme.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"i l","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"i l","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/"},"author":{"name":"i l","@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/#\/schema\/person\/7586712b9c512fe68085de007378c915"},"headline":"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb","datePublished":"2026-07-07T14:02:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-07T14:29:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/"},"wordCount":1525,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Supreme.jpg","articleSection":["Kosov\u00eb","Lajme"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/","url":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/","name":"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb - Kosova Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Supreme.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-07T14:02:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-07T14:29:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/#\/schema\/person\/7586712b9c512fe68085de007378c915"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Supreme.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Supreme.jpg","width":780,"height":500},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/2026\/07\/07\/supremja-refuzon-ankesat-kunder-vendimeve-te-pzap-se\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supremja refuzon ankesat kund\u00ebr vendimeve t\u00eb PZAP-s\u00eb"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/","name":"Kosova Times","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/#\/schema\/person\/7586712b9c512fe68085de007378c915","name":"i l","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bad9296e02816160ae2e2435beda58222022298d5625d49fea74d18816fbb31d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bad9296e02816160ae2e2435beda58222022298d5625d49fea74d18816fbb31d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bad9296e02816160ae2e2435beda58222022298d5625d49fea74d18816fbb31d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"i l"},"url":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/author\/iliri\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23010"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23010\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23012,"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23010\/revisions\/23012"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23011"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kosovatimes.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}